首页> 外文OA文献 >Conservative Ministers in the Coalition Government of 2010-15: Evidence of Bias in the Ministerial Selections of David Cameron?
【2h】

Conservative Ministers in the Coalition Government of 2010-15: Evidence of Bias in the Ministerial Selections of David Cameron?

机译:2010 - 15年联合政府的保守派部长:大卫卡梅伦的部长选举中的偏见证据?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The article uses a dataset of the 2010-15 Parliamentary Conservative Party (PCP) to test a series of hypotheses in order to determine whether those selected for ministerial office during the coalition era were representative of the PCP as a whole. Our findings show no significant associations or bias by Cameron in terms of age, schooling, regional base, morality, voting for Cameron in the Conservative Party leadership election and most significantly gender. Significant associations or bias were evident in terms of Cameron’s patronage with regard to University education and electoral marginality. Our findings demonstrate that any critique of current Conservative ministers based on their supposed elitism stem from the institutional and structural biases within the Conservative Party at candidate selection level, and cannot be attributed to bias on behalf of Cameron.
机译:本文使用2010-15国会保守党(PCP)的数据集来检验一系列假设,以确定在联盟时代被选为部长级职位的那些人是否整体上代表了PCP。我们的研究结果显示,卡梅伦在年龄,学历,地区基础,道德,在保守党领导人选举中投票支持卡梅伦,以及最重要的性别方面均无明显关联或偏见。在卡梅伦(Cameron)对大学教育和选举边缘性的支持方面,存在明显的联系或偏见。我们的发现表明,对现任保守党部长基于他们所谓的精英主义的任何批评都源于保守党在候选人selection选水平上的体制和结构偏见,而不能归因于代表卡梅伦的偏见。

著录项

  • 作者

    Heppell, T; Crines, A;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号